Beat Sheet · Michael Clayton (2007)

Michael Clayton Beat Sheet

Seventy-six minute-marked beats, Arthur Edens to Shiva the God of Death, from the opening voice-over to the cab

Four days earlier

The title card that turns a prologue into a promise

I’m not a miracle worker, I’m a janitor.

Michael Clayton, 12m

Give me fifty dollars worth. Just drive.

Michael Clayton, 114m

William Robert Rich
William Robert Rich

William Robert Rich is the editor of ScreenplayHowTo.com (SHT) and co-author of Story Maps: The Films of Christopher Nolan.

Based in Brooklyn, New York, William's unique approach to narrative analysis fuses his background as a former teacher and a software engineer. He realized that the efficient logic of code and the clear pedagogy of the classroom could be applied directly to screenwriting.

This data-driven approach allows him to rigorously analyze a screenplay's logic and identify structural inconsistencies, forming the foundation of all the high-authority beat sheets and structural insights featured on SHT. He makes the engineering of a great story easy to learn.

Articles: 191

13 Comments

  1. I don’t know how long ago you wrote this excellent synopsis and if you’re still responding to questions about it, but I am in the dark about how Michael Clayton knew that Karen was behind the hits. He’s only had one brief meeting with her, and she seemed more an ordinary corporate stooge there than a criminal mastermind. He’s not that deeply versed in Arthur’s case or who Arthur’s adversaries were — all of this just fell into his lap a few days ago. She has bosses and subordinates who could have ordered the hits. I know he’s very smart and intuitive, but what led him to her? Or was he just bluffing out of a desperate hunch? Thanks.

    • Good question. It’s been quite some time since I’ve last seen it, but I did take the time to review the map. First I would look at the suspicious actions behind Arthur’s suicide: Arthur always left notes; He planned to meet Anna with the evidence needed to win the case; He died right after the phone call that would have endangered the settlement. Remember, it was three-billion dollar class action lawsuit that would destroy the company and Arthur was their badass litigator who turned against them. So, the motivation to have Arthur killed points to uNorth (or possibly, the firm) and that only points to the top. Then Michael goes to Arthur’s home and the cops arrive too quick, leading him to believe that the apartment was bugged as Arthur had speculated. Then, Michael’s car blows after he picks up the memorandum. But, in a sense, you’re right – it was a bluff. He had no hard evidence against her. It’s not like Mr. Verne would turn on her. What it boils down to is Michael is a gambler and his gamble finally paid off. He basically lost everything – money/career – but he got his soul back.

      • Just came across your answer. Thanks. It’s a good point that we should focus on his time in Arthur’s apartment. We don’t know just how much he learned there. Next time I feel cynical and hard-boiled, I’ll have to have another look at this movie.

      • I love this movie, thanks for your analysis. I think Michael knew Arthur was murdered when he saw the champagne in the fridge. I’m going to look to the script again and see why he assumed it was Karen..

      • Arthur knows his phones are being tapped, and he conveys this to Michael.
        After Arthur’s death, and the notice of U-North suddenly settling, Michael’s instincts tell him something’s not quite right; something dark. This is reasonable as not only is the timing bad, but when he decides to have a look at Arthur’s apartment in an empty building, suddenly the police show up (“Who called 911?”).

        He is a “fixer” after all. That character background alone and with his contacts in law enforcement and “People I know”; he would know what possibilities are behind Arthur’s suspicious death.

        So when he has the “Summon’s to Conquest” copy from the receipt in Arthur’s apartment in the “Realm & Conquest” (Truth and Justice says Gilroy), he certainly knows the risk (“What would they do? What if they found out about it? … Are you soft, they’re doing it?”).

        Certainly his own car blowing up amplified all of this.

        Where might he show up at this late our after Arthur’s death, the sudden settlement offer, him wondering (intelligently as a fixer) how he was caught at Arthur’s appointment, finally the big one: His car explodes.

        What to do? Go to the settlement meeting and hang. Who comes out? It’s a meeting of chance with the lead counsel. It’s obvious he contacts his brother (who knows about the “car bomb” as well as the firm does).

        All this is reasonable.

    • I believe the answer lies with Arthur’s missing briefcase.

      In Wisconsin, Michael asks the legal team where Arthur’s briefcase is, and no one from the firm knows. Later we see Karen has it. She takes it to Marty, and Michael later sees Marty going through Arthur’s things, noting, “We were looking for it.”

      If no one from the firm had the briefcase, but it ended up in Marty’s possession, then someone *not* from the firm must have given it to him. The only person in Wisconsin with any stake in what was happening, who would have had access to give Arthur’s briefcase to Marty, was Karen, who Michael met with. Marty even mentions Michael’s meeting with Karen during the same scene where Michael sees he has the briefcase, likely solidifying Michael’s assumption that Karen gave it to him.

      So when things start hitting the fan, it’s an easy leap that someone from U-North had Arthur killed, and who at U-North is close enough to the case and highly-placed enough to make that call? Karen.

      It’s still an assumption, and I love the other observations made that Michael’s play against her is a gamble – I never picked up on that – but I do believe the logic leading him to Karen is stronger that just a wild guess.

    • I think Michael saw the signatures at the last page of Memorandum #229, one of them was Karen’s. He knew from his previous talk with her that she was working on the case. Knowing now that her signature was there, he figured out that she must have been very interested in a) getting rid of it, therefore possibly having to do with Arthurs’ murder and the attempt on his, and b) that there is a chance she buys his offer to pay his silence. Thats’ why he contacted her. He also tells her something like ” when you proceed to the last page of the document”, reminding her on her signature there and that she personally would be persceuted if the Memorandum would be published, pushing her to accept his pretended deal.

  2. The car bomb moment makes no sense.
    Why would they stage a near perfect suicide for Author and a car bomb for Michael Clayton?

    Seems like a failure in the hitman’s logic. If you have already created a successful hit and then follow with a blatant Car Bomb? No logic what so ever. This would only open up questions to Author’s death.

    Also the wire is very convenient, a cliche in every crime/snitch movie.

    • Michael is a compulsive gambler and owed money to the kind of people who don’t take you to court. Doesn’t matter if he paid them back right before the car blew up; It’s the fact that many people – Marty, brother, ex-wife, co-workers, etc – are aware of his vice. Cops would most certainly start their investigation there.

  3. I think the film wraps up too quickly after the car bomb; Michael’s brother picks him up, then a scene or two at Kenner Bach, then into the shareholders meeting and the finale. I feel a little cheated, after the fantastic story and character development in the first two acts, that things are kind of shorthanded to the great last scene and the film ends. Would have loved 5 minutes or so of Michael’s moves before the final confrontation —

  4. I admire the economy of things in this movie. When Arthur and Michael meet in the alley Michael says to Arthur: “You keep pissing on this case, they´ll cut you off at the knees. Arthur replies that he doesn’t understand what Michael is talking about ( subtext: He doesn’t want to admit the danger). Michael knows power of Karen.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.